Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41512710›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2026

Links between central visual field loss and movement processing during walking.

Natela M Shanidze, Catherine P Agathos, Toby J Ellmers, William R Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natela M ShanidzeThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: natela@ski.org.
Catherine P AgathosThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Toby J EllmersDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
William R YoungDepartment of Public Health and Sports Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Vision ResearchT32EY025201 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Preeti Verghese · 2016 to 2026
$1.2M
Coordination of Eye and Head Movements in Central Field LossR00EY026994 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SHANIDZE, NATELA M. · 2018 to 2020
$751k
Coordination of Eye and Head Movements in Central Field LossK99EY026994 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SHANIDZE, NATELA M. · 2016 to 2017
$186k
ACL HHS 90REGE0018NEI NIH HHS K99 EY026994NEI NIH HHS R00 EY026994NEI NIH HHS T32 EY025201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral visual field loss (CFL) is the most common irreversible visual impairment in aging and is associated with higher fall risk and concerns about falling. This study explored the links between CFL severity, functional balance, and walking-related attentional processing implicated in reduced gait performance.

methodsIn Study 1, 29 individuals with CFL and 29 age-matched controls completed the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. In Study 2, 10 CFL participants and 10 controls performed the TUG while acceleration data were collected from head and trunk IMUs. For both studies, we assessed visual impairment severity (contrast sensitivity) and participants' attentional processing during walking (Gait-Specific Attentional Profile, G-SAP).

resultsBoth groups showed positive correlations between TUG duration and G-SAP subscales. G-SAP scores were lower in CFL participants with worse contrast sensitivity indicating reduced cognitive processing during walking. Worse contrast sensitivity was also associated with greater head and trunk acceleration and acceleration variability during walking, suggesting reduced gait stability. Higher rumination and conscious movement processing scores also correlated with improved segmental control in CFL. SIGNIFICANCE: Increased cognitive processing of gait is associated with impaired functional balance. This association appears to be reversed in CFL, with severe visual deficit diverting cognitive resources from movement control. This altered strategy may prioritise the acquisition and processing of visuospatial information in CFL. The observed postural instability with increasing CFL severity and a lack of excessive cognitive involvement in movement control suggest heightened gait-specific attention could be leveraged for balance and gait training in CFL.

Indexed as

AttentionGaitPostural BalanceVision DisordersVisual FieldsWalkingAgedCase-Control StudiesContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAgingContrast sensitivityGait-specific attentionMacular degenerationTimed up and goVisual deficit

Identifiers

PMID41512710
PMCPMC12829985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.