ArticleEnvironment international2026
Impacts of urban adaptation on reducing temperatures and heat-related deaths in Belgium.
Article in Environment international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme heat poses increasing risks to urban populations, yet the effectiveness of adaptation strategies at larger scales beyond neighbourhoods remains poorly quantified. The July 2019 heatwave in northwestern Europe, one of the hottest on record, offers a unique opportunity to evaluate city- and country-scale interventions in Belgium, in one of the world's most urbanised mid-latitude regions. Using high-resolution urban climate modelling, we investigated the benefits of adaptation strategies on urban air temperatures. Our modelling of urban air temperatures suggests that the widespread deployment of cool roofs could reduce daily maxima by 2.1 °C, while combining them with a 20 % relative increase in vegetation could lower daily minima by 1.7 °C. Here, we found substantial temperature differences between compact and open urban areas and, subsequently, in population exposure to extreme heat. Furthermore, we estimate that the implementation of cool roofs could have avoided around a quarter of all heat-related deaths during this extreme heatwave event in Brussels. Our results show that adaptation strategies must be tailored to local urban characteristics to achieve substantial reductions in temperature and mortality, with more compact urban areas benefiting most from cool roofs during the day while the combination of cool roofs and increased vegetation has more impact on reducing nighttime temperatures in open urban areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.