ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
sedimix: a workflow for the analysis of hominin nuclear DNA sequences from sediments.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quick Analysis of Sedimentary Ancient DNA Using quicksand.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summarySediment DNA-the recovery of genetic material from archaeological sediments-is an exciting new frontier in ancient DNA research, offering the potential to study individuals at a given archaeological site without destructive sampling. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated the promise of this approach by extracting hominin DNA from prehistoric sediments, including those dating back to the Middle or Late Pleistocene. However, a lack of open-source workflows for analysis of hominin sediment DNA samples poses a challenge for data processing and reproducibility of findings across studies. Here, we introduce a snakemake workflow, sedimix, for processing genomic sequences from archaeological sediment DNA samples to identify hominin sequences and generate relevant summary statistics to assess the reliability of the pipeline. By performing simulations and comparing our results to two published studies with human DNA from ∼25,000 years ago (including shotgun data from a sediment sample and capture data from touch DNA recovered from a deer tooth pendant) we demonstrate that sedimix yields accurate and reliable inferences. sedimix offers a reliable and adaptable framework to aid in the analysis of sediment DNA datasets and improve reproducibility across studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: sedimix is available as an open-source software with the associated code, example data, and user manual with installation instructions available at https://github.com/jierui-cell/sedimix. A permanent archived version of this release is available via Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17244854.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.