ArticleThe American journal of managed care2025
Mental health care use after leaving Medicare Advantage for traditional Medicare.
Article in The American journal of managed care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate changes in mental health visits and specialties among beneficiaries with at least 1 mental health visit before and after switching from Medicare Advantage (MA) to traditional Medicare (TM). STUDY
designThis study examines Medicare beneficiaries with mental health diagnoses who switched from MA to TM in 2018, analyzing their mental health utilization 12 months before and after the switch using MA encounter and TM claims data.
methodsA longitudinal design was used, comparing mental health visits before and after the switch. We applied Wilcoxon signed rank tests to compare the total number of visits and McNemar tests for specific provider specialties used. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than .05.
resultsOf the 32,710 beneficiaries who switched from MA to TM in 2018, 1184 beneficiaries (11,015 claims) were included in our sample because they had at least 1 health care visit attributed to a mental health condition both before and after switching. We found a statistically significant increase in the number of mental health visits after switching (P = .014). For the top 5 most prevalent specialties used for mental health care, we found no change in the use of psychiatrists (P = .607) or family medicine specialists (P = .696). However, we found increased use of nurse practitioners (P < .001) alongside decreased use of internal medicine (P = .003) and emergency medicine specialists (P = .001) for mental health care after switching.
conclusionsAmong beneficiaries with continued mental health care utilization, switching from MA to TM was associated with increased mental health visits and a shift in provider composition, which suggests potential care gaps or unmet needs in MA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.