ArticlePloS one2026
Phytochemical characterization, total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant capacity, enzymatic profiling, and cytotoxicity of Bidens pilosa and Croton sp. from Colombia for applications in skin health.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the chemical and biological potential of Bidens pilosa and Croton sp., plants from megadiverse ecosystems in Colombia, collected in Santander de Quilichao (Cauca) and San Basilio de Palenque (Bolivar). The chemical profile was analyzed by UHPLC-ESI-Orbitrap-HRMS, and the total phenolic and flavonoid content was quantified using colorimetric methods. Antioxidant capacity was assessed using methods that evaluate reducing power and electron transfer mechanisms. The inhibition of key enzymes in skin aging, such as tyrosinase, hyaluronidase, and collagenase, was evaluated, as well as cytotoxicity in keratinocytes and human melanoma cells. Chemical characterization revealed distinctive phytochemical profiles: B. pilosa contained 21.1 mg GAE/g DT of phenolics and 64.6 mg RE/g DT of flavonoids, dominated by p-coumaric acid and rosmarinic acid, while Croton sp. exhibited higher levels of phenolics (169.4 mg GAE/g DT) and 54.1 mg RE/g DT of flavonoids, highlighting rosmarinic acid, p-coumaric acid and quercetin. Both extracts showed significant antioxidant capacity and enzyme modulation, including moderate collagenase inhibition (53.9-55.0%), high hyaluronidase inhibition (64.5-76.5%), and low tyrosinase inhibition (11.1-12.7%), suggesting protection of extracellular matrix and hyaluronic acid during skin aging. Sun protection factor was limited (SPF: 14.5 for B. pilosa and 11.6 for Croton sp.), with low ultraviolet absorption, consistent with low antityrosinase activity. Cytotoxicity assays demonstrated that B. pilosa was not toxic to HaCaT keratinocytes (IC₅₀ > 500 µg/mL) and displayed antimelanoma activity on A375 cells (IC₅₀ = 398.6 µg/mL), whereas Croton sp. showed moderate selectivity towards melanoma cells (IC₅₀ HaCaT = 329.5 µg/mL; IC₅₀ A375 = 189.0 µg/mL). The results suggest that both plants have potential in dermatological applications such as anti-melanoma agents, antioxidants, and modulators of skin aging enzymes, although highlight the importance of improving strategies to maximize their efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.