Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511956›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Marginal Cost of Carbon Sequestration Using Straw-Based Biochar in Great Britain.

Yuzhou Tang, Paul Wilson, Tim T Cockerill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuzhou TangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-5740
Paul WilsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham LE12 5RD, U.K.
Tim T CockerillSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving the net-zero target of the United Kingdom requires substantial greenhouse gas removal (GGR) in addition to emission reductions. Biochar, a stable carbon-rich material produced through biomass pyrolysis, is an established GGR method. Straw is abundantly available in the UK and presents a viable option for large-scale biochar production. However, uncertainties regarding its feasibility remain, particularly concerning costs, spatial constraints, and facility construction. Here, we use a spatial model integrated with life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis to estimate the marginal cost curve for net carbon sequestration through straw-based biochar production in Great Britain (GB). Our findings reveal that straw-based biochar production in GB can achieve 0.6-1.9% of the UK's 2050 carbon removal target at marginal costs below £75 per tCO

Indexed as

Carbon SequestrationCharcoalUnited KingdombiocharCharcoalbiochar productioncarbon sequestrationmarginal costscalabilityspatial analysisstraw

Identifiers

PMID41511956
PMCPMC12854751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.