ArticlePloS one2026
A deep learning model to enhance lung cancer detection using 'Dual-Branch' model classification approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a life-threatening global challenge, with lung cancer ranking among the most devastating forms, impacting millions annually. Early detection and accurate classification are essential for improving patient survival rates, and computed tomography (CT) has become a critical tool in lung cancer diagnosis. Despite advancements, previous studies have faced notable challenges, particularly a shortage of available samples and limitations in input modalities, both of which hinder model performance. Addressing these issues, this research introduces the Dual-Branch Model Classification Approach (DbMCA), a two-stage strategy that integrates image and mask data to enhance detection accuracy and scalability. Two comparative experiments were conducted using the LIDC-IDRI dataset with varying data sizes to evaluate the impact of sample size and dual-input modalities. The DbMCA achieved remarkable results, as it performed higher accuracy results a 91.21% accuracy and 91.18% F1-score in the smaller dataset and an exceptional 98.04% accuracy and 98.01% F1-score in the larger dataset. CNN performance on sparse mask data declines with scale, while DNN and SVM consistently outperform it, highlighting architecture sensitivity to sparsity. This demonstrates the model's improved discriminative power and potential for detecting subtle lung cancer patterns, however, based on statistical evidence DbMCA significantly outperforms weaker baselines and successfully integrates multi-modal information. Nonetheless, certain limitations were observed, such as the high computational requirements stemming from large sample sizes, the constrained information provided by segmentation masks, and the presence of potential biases in the dataset. These challenges hinder the model's ability to generalize effectively. Future research should aim to enhance image quality, broaden the scope of datasets, and overcome segmentation-related constraints to make further progress in lung cancer detection. The DbMCA represents a significant step forward in improving the performance and scalability of diagnostic tools, offering the potential for more effective and lifesaving interventions in lung cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.