ArticlePloS one2026
Influence mechanism exploration and machine learning prediction of loess compression deformation coefficient under multi-factor coupling effects.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the compression deformation coefficient of loess fillers is key for stability assessment of loess subgrade engineering. In this study, the effects of key influencing factors such as compaction, water content, vertical pressure and molding method on compression characteristics were investigated. Four machine learning models, XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Backpropagation Neural Network (BP), and Sparrow Search Algorithm-optimized BP (SSA-BP), were developed to predict the deformation coefficient using experimental datasets. SHAP interpretability analysis quantified feature contributions and coupling effects. Results demonstrate that: Vibration compaction, increased compaction, and reduced water content enhance particle interlocking, thereby effectively suppressing deformation and reducing the compression deformation coefficient; The coefficient significantly increases with rising vertical pressure in compacted loess. The metaheuristic-optimized SSA-BP model demonstrated superior performance with a test set RMSE of 0.138%, significantly outperforming both the SVR、XGB and standard BP models by 35%、45%and 46%, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed vertical pressure as the most influential factor and identified significant nonlinear interactions, particularly between vertical pressure and water content. These findings provide both a reliable prediction tool and mechanistic insights for loess subgrade engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.