Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511938›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Machine translationese of large language models: Dependency triplets, text classification, and SHAP analysis.

Shukang Zhang, Chaoyong Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shukang ZhangSchool of Foreign Languages, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4899-5049
Chaoyong ZhaoSchool of Foreign Languages, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of distinguishing human translations from those generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) by utilizing dependency triplet features and evaluating 16 machine learning classifiers. Using 10-fold cross-validation, the SVM model achieves the highest mean F1-score of 93%, while all other classifiers consistently differentiate between human and machine translations. SHAP analysis helps identify key dependency features that distinguish human and machine translations, improving our understanding of how LLMs produce translationese. The findings provide practical insights for enhancing translation quality assessment and refining translation models across various languages and text genres, contributing to the advancement of natural language processing techniques. The dataset and implementation code of our study are available at: https://github.com/KiemaG5/LLM-translationese.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingClassification AlgorithmsHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41511938
PMCPMC12788636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.