Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511806›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Computed Tomographic Features of Benign and Malignant External Ear Canal Neoplasms in 39 Dogs.

Kaylynn Veitch, Christine Gremillion, Gwendolyn Levine, Cambridge Coy, Megan Wisnoski, John F Griffin, Kenneth Waller

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Computed Tomographic Features of Benign and Malignant External Ear Canal Neoplasms in 39 Dogs.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaylynn VeitchDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1398-1557
Christine GremillionDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8169-3061
Gwendolyn LevineDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Cambridge CoyDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Megan WisnoskiDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
John F GriffinDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Kenneth WallerDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to evaluate external and middle ear disease and for surgical planning in dogs. However, there is limited literature regarding CT characteristics of benign and malignant canine external ear canal neoplasms. This retrospective, multicenter, secondary analysis, cross-sectional study compared the CT features of benign and malignant tumors in 39 dogs with 41 external ear canal masses by consensus of two veterinary radiologists. Recorded parameters were the presence of focal or multifocal tissue enlargement (mass/masses), lesion shape, location of the center of the mass, attenuation characteristics, features of contrast enhancement, involvement of otic structures, calvarial and brain changes, changes of nearby structures, and lymphadenopathy. The most common neoplasms in this study were ceruminous gland adenocarcinoma (13/41) and ceruminous gland adenoma (11/41). Although malignant tumors more commonly exhibited heterogeneous attenuation, heterogeneous contrast enhancement, aggressive periosteal proliferation, and compressed/displaced and/or invaded regional structures, benign tumors also exhibited aggressive characteristics, such as adjacent osteolysis. Given the degree of overlap of CT findings between benign and malignant external ear canal neoplasms, features may only aid in prioritizing differential diagnoses, and biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesEar CanalEar NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective Studiescomputed tomographyexternal ear canal neoplasiaotitis externa

Identifiers

PMID41511806
PMCPMC12788333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.