ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Progressive Improvements with Repeated High-Concentration Capsaicin Patch: Real-World Data from the Retrospective CASPAR German Pain e-Registry Study in Postherpetic Neuralgia.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic neuropathic pain condition that disproportionally affects older adults. First-line oral treatments often yield suboptimal relief and may cause systemic side effects and drug-drug interactions. Effective topical treatments offer the potential to address this significant unmet medical need in PHN. This CASPAR analysis evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of the high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) in patients with PHN.
methodsReal-world data were evaluated for a large PHN cohort extracted from the German Pain e-Registry as part of the retrospective, noninterventional, multicohort CASPAR study. Patients received one to four HCCP treatments over 12 months. Patient-reported outcomes included average pain intensity (API), quality of life (QoL), sleep impairment, mood, concurrent pain medications, and safety.
resultsThis analysis included 961 patients with PHN (mean age: 63.8 years, female: 69.7%; mean pain duration: 3.3 years) receiving one (n = 187), two (n = 209), three (n = 207), or four HCCP treatments (n = 358). Mean 24-h API decreased from 61.8 at baseline to 46.8 by month 3 (P < 0.001), and to 31.8 at month 12 (P < 0.001). Patients receiving four treatments had the greatest API reductions (63.7 at baseline versus 19.6 at month 12; P < 0.001), whereas improvements were lost in those who discontinued treatment. While ≥ 30% API response rates were similar across treatment groups at month 3 (25.6-30.7% of patients), those receiving additional treatments showed continued improvement, peaking at 99.7% by month 12 after four HCCP treatments. Trends were similar for other patient-reported outcomes, including QoL, sleep, and mood. Concomitant pain medication use decreased over time. Most adverse drug reactions were mild and application site-specific.
conclusionsHCCP is an effective and well-tolerated topical treatment for patients with PHN, including older adults. After one treatment, improvements were noted in API, QoL, sleep, and mood outcomes, alongside decreased concomitant pain medication use, with progressive improvements following additional treatments. A Graphical Abstract is available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.