ArticleCurrent medical science2026
Time-Dependent Fluid Accumulation Index for Phase-Specific Risk Stratification in Septic Shock with Heart Failure.
Article in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFluid management in patients with septic shock and coexisting heart failure is a critical challenge, as it requires balancing resuscitation and the risk of fluid overload. This study investigated the potential of the fluid accumulation index (FAI), which is measured serially during the initial 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) care, to provide dynamic prognostic information to guide fluid management in this high-risk population.
methodsRestricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to explore the relationships between FAI levels at different time points within 72 h of ICU admission and ICU mortality. Associations were quantified via multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses and Kaplan‒Meier survival curves were used to evaluate the consistency of associations and differences in survival between groups.
resultsA total of 643 patients with septic shock and concurrent heart failure were included, among whom 127 died. The RCS revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between FAI levels at various time points and ICU mortality. The optimal FAI cutoff values decreased over time: the cumulative values were 0.87 at 24 h, 0.59 at 48 h, and 0.56 at 72 h. The cutoff values for specific intervals were 0.27 for the 24-48 h period (2-24 h-FAI) and 0.12 for the 48-72 h period (3-24 h-FAI). In the fully adjusted model, FAI values exceeding these time-specific thresholds were significantly associated with increased ICU mortality (24 h-FAI > 0.87, HR = 1.96, P = 0.0251; 2-24 h-FAI > 0.27, HR = 2.07, P = 0.0051; 48 h-FAI > 0.59, HR = 2.50, P = 0.0005; 3-24 h-FAI > 0.12, HR = 2.05, P = 0.0091; 72 h-FAI > 0.56, HR = 2.97, P < 0.0001). These associations remained consistent across most predefined subgroups.
conclusionFAI serves as a dynamic and independent prognostic marker for critically ill patients with septic shock and heart failure during the first 72 h of ICU admission. A key finding was the time-dependent decline in the optimal FAI cutoff values (0.87 at 24 h vs. 0.12 for the 3-24 h period). This temporal decline supports a shift in fluid management strategy from an initial liberal approach toward a conservative strategy after the first 24 h, which may mitigate mortality risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41511737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.