ArticleOral radiology2026
Towards accurate occlusal plane positioning in panoramic radiographs: a deep learning-assisted study.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of deep learning architectures in automatically classifying head positioning errors on panoramic radiographs (PRs).
methodsA total of 480 anonymized PR images were retrospectively collected and categorized by an experienced oral radiologist based on occlusal plane orientation. The dataset was randomly split into 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing to ensure balanced model evaluation. Several pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer (ViT) models were fine-tuned using transfer learning (TL) strategy. Models were evaluated using widely adopted performance metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under curve based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC).
resultsAmong the tested architectures, ResNet18 achieved the best performance, with an overall test accuracy and F1-score of 0.84. The ViT model demonstrated comparatively lower performance (accuracy and F1-score: 0.77), which may be attributable to the relatively small dataset size. In terms of ROC-AUC performance indicator, ResNet18 also outperformed the ViT model across all classes, revealing superior discriminative capability.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, no prior study has comprehensively evaluated both convolution-based and transformer-based deep learning architectures for detecting occlusal plane positioning errors in PRs. The findings suggest that CNN-based models-particularly ResNet18-can effectively identify such errors. These models may help reduce positioning mistakes, especially in PRs acquired by students or less experienced operators, thereby promoting increased standardization, improved image quality, and enhanced diagnostic reliability in dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41511698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.