ArticleEJNMMI research2026
Head-to-head comparison of [
Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of treatment efficacy of theEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Progress in the application ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTerbium-161 (Tb-161) emits internal conversion and Auger electrons, in addition to beta-minus radiation, which might be of added benefit for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) compared to Lutetium-177 (Lu-177). We extensively compared Lu-177 and Tb-161 for fibroblast activation protein (FAP)- TRT in a preclinical setting. To study this, FAP-2286 was labeled with Lu-177 and Tb-161 and characterized in vitro on FAP-expressing cells and ex vivo using patient tumor samples. Moreover, in vivo studies (i.e. biodistribution and efficacy) were performed using a clinically representative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse model. Biodistribution was performed 1, 4, 24, and 48 h post injection of 5 MBq/500 pmol [
resultsNo difference in [
conclusionsIn our in vitro and in vivo studies, [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.