Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511658›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Achieving Quality Outcomes at reduced costs in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Tertiary Centre's experience with 330 Robotic Rectal Cancer resections.

Gilbert Samuel Jebakumar, Aarti Kalyanaraman, Prasanth Nagarajan, Sudeepta Kumar Swain, Venkatesh Munikrishnan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gilbert Samuel JebakumarSurgical Gastroenterology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-665X
Aarti KalyanaramanApollo Rectal Cancer Programme, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India. docrti@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7790-1554
Prasanth NagarajanApollo Rectal Cancer Programme, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3997-7618
Sudeepta Kumar SwainApollo Rectal Cancer Programme, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-9398
Venkatesh MunikrishnanApollo Rectal Cancer Programme, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4724-0708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal cancer surgery can be extremely challenging in the confines of a bony pelvis with adjoining vital structures. The male pelvis and obesity add to these challenges. Robotic systems provide surgeons with enhanced dexterity, precision, and visualization, making them particularly suitable for Rectal cancer surgeries. The major challenge with a robotic platform is additional per patient cost for using the robotic system, instruments and maintenance. To address this, we have standardized three important aspects of Rectal surgery. Firstly, through sub specialization of the surgeon in Rectal surgery, secondly standardization of the Robotic TME technique and thirdly by taking steps to reduce associated costs without compromising patient outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess if we can improve surgical outcomes while achieving cost efficiency in Robotic Rectal Cancer surgery. The early surgical outcomes like anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, readmission, re-exploration, margin positivity, and length of stay are comparable (sometimes even better) in our study as compared to the robotic group of ACS-NSQIP(American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) study. Additionally, our average cost of INR 450,315 ($ 5122.10) is significantly lower than the national range of INR 500, 000 to INR 1,000,000 ($ 5687.2 to $11374.4) for Robotic Rectal Cancer surgery. This study demonstrates that by adopting subspecialisation, standardising technique and implementing cost saving measures we can deliver favourable outcomes in Rectal cancer surgery and, do so cost effectively. This in turn opens the opportunity for wide spread use of Robotic Rectal Cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTreatment OutcomeCost EffectivenessRectal Cancer SurgeryRobotic Surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.