ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Achieving Quality Outcomes at reduced costs in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Tertiary Centre's experience with 330 Robotic Rectal Cancer resections.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal cancer surgery can be extremely challenging in the confines of a bony pelvis with adjoining vital structures. The male pelvis and obesity add to these challenges. Robotic systems provide surgeons with enhanced dexterity, precision, and visualization, making them particularly suitable for Rectal cancer surgeries. The major challenge with a robotic platform is additional per patient cost for using the robotic system, instruments and maintenance. To address this, we have standardized three important aspects of Rectal surgery. Firstly, through sub specialization of the surgeon in Rectal surgery, secondly standardization of the Robotic TME technique and thirdly by taking steps to reduce associated costs without compromising patient outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess if we can improve surgical outcomes while achieving cost efficiency in Robotic Rectal Cancer surgery. The early surgical outcomes like anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, readmission, re-exploration, margin positivity, and length of stay are comparable (sometimes even better) in our study as compared to the robotic group of ACS-NSQIP(American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) study. Additionally, our average cost of INR 450,315 ($ 5122.10) is significantly lower than the national range of INR 500, 000 to INR 1,000,000 ($ 5687.2 to $11374.4) for Robotic Rectal Cancer surgery. This study demonstrates that by adopting subspecialisation, standardising technique and implementing cost saving measures we can deliver favourable outcomes in Rectal cancer surgery and, do so cost effectively. This in turn opens the opportunity for wide spread use of Robotic Rectal Cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41511658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.