ArticleAmbio2026
How do members of the public feel about novel ecosystem interventions? A longitudinal study of emotional responses to restoration and adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef.
Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate-responsive ecosystem interventions are increasingly proposed to support coral reef futures, yet the emotional dimensions of public responses remain poorly understood. Drawing on three large-scale surveys of Australians conducted in 2018, 2022, and 2024 (n = 8460), this study examines longitudinal shifts in emotional responses to six novel restoration and adaptation strategies in the Great Barrier Reef. Across all waves, positive emotions, especially hope and confidence, remained relatively stable, while several negative emotions fluctuated over time, with renewed intensification in 2024. Demographic position was associated with emotional variation, with younger and socioeconomically vulnerable respondents expressing stronger negative responses. We argue emotions are relational forces shaped by social conditions and perceived agency rather than purely individual dispositions. The study offers a transferable empirical framework for examining emotional responses to emerging ecological interventions, highlighting the value of integrating affective insight into adaptive environmental governance and public engagement in contexts of climatic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.