Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511655›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Decarbonising homes and the in-between: Intersections of visible and latent climate-wise housing and mobility.

Joni Tuomas Vainikka, Uula Saastamoinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joni Tuomas VainikkaDepartment of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, Yliopistonkatu 3, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. joni.vainikka@helsinki.fi.
Uula SaastamoinenFinnish Environment Institute, SYKE, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Strategic Research Council 358279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective decarbonisation must be socially equitable and attentive to the capacities of households to adopt and apply new social practices at home and in mobility spaces in-between. Understanding attitudinal landscapes and the dynamics of social recognition and interaction surrounding decarbonisation helps advance technical solutions and reduce consumption. This paper approaches decarbonisation as a "social dramaturgy" of climate-friendly practices and conceptualises the modalities and performances of climate action in public and private spaces, following Erving Goffman's notions of "front- and backstages". Analysing a geocoded Finnish survey from 2022 (n = 1446), we compare visible technological solutions with more latent, self-reported energy- and resource-saving practices. By examining how attitudes toward climate change shape beliefs in various solutions, we find that backstage decarbonisation practices align more with climate change concerns, while frontstage practices diffuse more easily. This novel sociospatial approach contributes to debates on the legitimacy of climate action and efforts to curb segregation concurrently.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHousingFinlandHumansClimate changeDecarbonisationErving GoffmanFinlandHomeMobilities

Identifiers

PMID41511655
PMCPMC13437873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.