ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026
Textbook outcome in gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter cohort study and proposal for a new specific index (TOGS).
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Textbook Outcome (TO) and Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) on Survival Following Surgery for Esophagogastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Validation of Textbook Outcome in Gastric Surgery (TOGS) for Primary Gastric Cancer in an Eastern High-Volume Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Need for a Textbook Outcome in Gastric Surgery (TOGS) Specific for Gastric Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTextbook Outcome (TO) combines optimal surgical outcomes into a single measure. This study evaluates achievement of TO using a multicenter database, assessing hospital variation, its correlation with early and late results, and refining a tailored definition of Textbook Outcome in Gastric Surgery (TOGS).
methodsData from patients undergoing curative gastrectomy (2011–2020) in Italian centers affiliated to the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group (GIRCG) were analyzed. TOGS was introduced at the 2024 GIRCG Annual Meeting in Siena (Italy).
resultsAmong 1988 patients (median age 72 years, BMI 24.9 kg/m2), 1523 underwent surgery in higher-volume centers (≥ 30 cases per year) and 465 in lower-volume centers (15–30 cases per year). TO was achieved in 54.6% of patients (55.2% in higher-volume vs. 52.7% in lower-volume centers, P = 0.350). Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher complications (34.8%) and re-interventions (11.5%) mostly affected the achievement of TO. Younger age (P < 0.001), early stages (P < 0.001), female gender (P = 0.005), open approach (P = 0.008) and absence of extensive surgery (P = 0.033) were independent predictors of TO. Patients achieving TO showed better survival (5-y 69.8% vs. 57.3%, HR 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54–0.75], P < 0.001), also when stratifying for tumor stages. The new TOGS definition, based on specific criteria for gastric surgery, reduced its achievement rate (50.2%) but shortened mean hospital stay (8.9 vs. 18 days) and increased the likelihood of long-term survival.
conclusionsTO and TOGS are valuable metrics for assessing hospital performance and optimizing outcomes following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hospital volume did not impact TO and TOGS rates in GIRCG centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41511638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.