Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511591›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2026

SmartDetector: a valid and affordable AI-based markerless motion capture system for psychological experiments.

Victor Francisco, Arnaud Decatoire, Olfa Ben Ahmed, Yannick Blandin, Christel Bidet-Ildei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor FranciscoCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: UMR7295, Poitiers, France.
Arnaud DecatoireUniversité de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA, CNRS, PPRIME, Poitiers, France.
Olfa Ben AhmedXLIM Research Institute, UMR CNRS 7252, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Yannick BlandinCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: UMR7295, Poitiers, France.
Christel Bidet-IldeiCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: UMR7295, Poitiers, France. christel.bidet.ildei@univ-poitiers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-179X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the validity of SmartDetector—a markerless motion capture device based on artificial intelligence—by comparing it to a conventional optoelectronic motion capture system (i.e., Qualisys) in the context of stimuli construction for psychological experiments. To this end, simultaneous motion capture recordings were performed using both the conventional system and the SmartDetector, enabling the creation of 2D kinematic data and the generation of two versions of point-light displays. Three perceptual experiments were then conducted to facilitate comparisons between the two systems: a recognition task, a detection task, and a discrimination task. Bayesian analysis was employed to test the null hypotheses regarding the stimuli generated by SmartDetector versus those produced by the conventional motion capture system. The results suggest that participants achieved comparable performance across both types of stimuli depending on the task with reduced processing time and lower costs for SmartDetector. These findings appear to validate SmartDetector as a reliable and accessible alternative for creating point-light displays, reducing processing time and costs, thus reinforcing its potential for widespread adoption by professionals in the field.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMotion CaptureMotion PerceptionRecognition, PsychologyAdultBayes TheoremBiomechanical PhenomenaDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsMaleReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceMarkerlessMotion capturePoint-light display

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.