ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer and short-term outcomes-a nationwide cohort study.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHigh-risk colon cancer may benefit from preoperative chemotherapy (preCHT), but evidence on its short-term safety and outcome is limited. Population-based evidence before its incorporation into national guidelines is lacking.
methodsPatients with final weighted stage II-III colon cancer undergoing elective resection between 2007 and 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients planned for preCHT, irrespective of intention, were compared with those undergoing upfront surgery. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality and 30-day major morbidity, defined as all medical and surgical complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 grade. Subgroup analyses examined cT4 disease, and multivariable logistic regression was performed.
resultsAmong 20,185 eligible patients, 299 (1.5%) received preCHT. Postoperative mortality was comparable (1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.00 at 30 days and 3.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.82 at 90 days). Overall and surgical postoperative morbidity (CD ≥ 3) was higher in the preCHT group (34.1 vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001 and 17.4% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), rates of anastomotic leakage were similar (3.3% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.85). Compared to upfront surgery, the preCHT group was more likely to undergo multivisceral resections (53.9% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of R1 resections (6.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), reflecting more advanced disease (cT4: 59.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001; cN1-2: 54.9% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). In the cT4 subgroup, short-term outcomes were comparable, and regression analyses found no independent association between preCHT and mortality or major morbidity.
conclusionPreCHT appeared feasible in cT4N0-2M0 colon cancer, with short-term outcomes comparable to upfront surgery despite more advanced primary tumour and greater surgical extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.