SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Adverse effects and discontinuation rates for darifenacin in overactive urinary bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the discontinuation rates, and incidence of adverse effects (AEs) for patients on prescribed oral darifenacin for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials. A risk of bias assessment and a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation were used to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was OAB patient discontinuation and AEs in darifenacin and placebo groups, and reporting was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Seven studies of 2381 participants were included. The most reported AEs were dry mouth and constipation. There were more participants with dry mouth in the darifenacin group compared to the placebo (p < 0.0001, moderate level of certainty) and a dose-response pattern was observed. There was a higher rate of constipation in the darifenacin group than in the placebo group (p < 0.0001, high level of certainty), with evidence of a dose-response pattern. There were no differences between the darifenacin group and the placebo group in total discontinuations (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.20) or undefined discontinuations (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.54-1.33). Studies were generally rated at low or unclear risk of bias for most domains. While patients prescribed darifenacin do experience a higher rate of side-effects, which increases with dose, they seem to be tolerated as both the intervention and placebo groups reported similar rates of discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.