ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta-Role of interventional radiology].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Role of interventional radiology in mass casualty incidents : Current state of evidence exemplified by the attack on the Magdeburg Christmas market].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic injuries are among the most life-threatening emergencies in vascular and emergency medicine. They are mostly caused by high-velocity trauma with deceleration and shear forces in the region of the aortic isthmus. Due to the anatomical features these particularly result in tears or complete transection of the vascular wall. Without rapid diagnosis and treatment the majority of cases are fatal. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) angiography is considered the diagnostic gold standard and enables a precise classification of the injury according to the severity and immediate treatment planning. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment of choice for lesion grades II and III. The interdisciplinary interplay of interventional radiology, cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia can achieve a significant reduction in the perioperative mortality. Although mortality rates of up to 20% have been reported after open surgery, the mortality after TEVAR is between 7% and 9%. Neurological complications, particularly spinal ischemia, are less common than after open surgical treatment. Following successful TEVAR a life-long imaging follow-up is necessary for the early detection of prosthesis migration, endoleaks or infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41511515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.