Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511416›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Continuous Theta Burst to Supplementary Motor Area Modulates Groove.

Connor Spiech, Mario Gómez Martínez, Giorgio Lazzari, Virginia Penhune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Connor SpiechDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-2096
Mario Gómez MartínezInstitute of Neurosciences of Castilla y León, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6394-1009
Giorgio LazzariDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-9326-4165
Virginia PenhuneDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9475-5724

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2021-04026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pleasurable urge to move to music ("groove") has been shown to be greatest for moderately complex musical rhythms. This is thought to occur because temporal predictions from the motor system reinforce our perception of the beat when there is a balance between expectation and surprise. The supplementary motor area (SMA) has been identified as the potential origin of these temporal predictions. Thus, to causally test the role of the SMA in the experience of groove, we used continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to disrupt activity in this region or an active control site (V1). Nonmusicians listened to and rated musical clips that varied in rhythmic complexity and groove before and after stimulation. Following inhibitory stimulation over the left SMA, participants preferred moving to music with higher rhythmic complexity while after V1 stimulation, they preferred moving to music with lower rhythmic complexity. Pleasure ratings, however, were unaffected. These results suggest that the SMA weighs the precision of beat-based predictions generated by the dorsal auditory stream. Therefore, stimulating the SMA may have disinhibited the dorsal striatum or other nodes generating the beat-based predictions. In summary, these findings provide causal evidence that the SMA and V1 play critical roles in embodied rhythm processing.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMotor CortexMusicTheta RhythmAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultcontinuous theta burstgroovepleasuresupplementary motor areatranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41511416
PMCPMC12924168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.