ReviewCells2025
Preclinical PET and SPECT Imaging in Small Animals: Technologies, Challenges and Translational Impact.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking In Vivo Imaging to Therapeutic Outcome withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluating the preoperative diagnostic value ofJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative Preclinical Imaging as a Metrological Framework: Reproducibility, Validation, and Translational Maturity.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Potential of Silver Nanoparticles in Imaging Diagnostics and Image-Guided Applications: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Preclinical in vivo dosimetry of healthy tissues in radiopharmaceutical therapy: implementation of a physiologically realistic mouse eye model in GATE.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular imaging in preclinical research using PET and SPECT has become a key component of contemporary biomedicine, enabling noninvasive, quantitative, and longitudinal assessment of biological processes in vivo. Rapid technological progress, including advances in detector design, readout electronics, reconstruction algorithms, and multimodal integration, has substantially improved spatial resolution, sensitivity, and quantitative accuracy, thereby enhancing the translational value of animal models. PET and SPECT enable precise characterization of metabolic, molecular, and functional alterations across a wide range of diseases including cancer, cardiovascular disorders, neurodegeneration, and inflammation. Radiopharmaceuticals targeting diverse biological pathways, combined with PET and SPECT systems, allow comprehensive and physiologically relevant evaluation of disease mechanisms and therapeutic responses. Despite these significant advances, important challenges remain, including limitations in quantitative precision, partial-volume effects and inter-laboratory variability in experimental protocols. An additional limitation is the lack of globally standardized quality-control and calibration procedures tailored to preclinical imaging systems. Emerging multimodal imaging platforms and high-fidelity disease models, such as genetically engineered rodents, large animals, and zebrafish, continue to enhance reproducibility, biological relevance, and translational potential. This review summarizes the development, capabilities, and limitations of preclinical PET and SPECT imaging, highlighting their expanding role in advancing molecular diagnostics, radiopharmaceutical development, and translational medicine in both preclinical studies and early-phase clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.