Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511354›Full record

ReviewCells2025

If Plan A Does Not Work: The CD47 Ectodomain as a Target for Immune Tolerance.

Enrique Montero, Jeffrey S Isenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enrique MonteroDepartment of Diabetes Immunology, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-6675
Jeffrey S IsenbergDepartment of Diabetes Complications & Metabolism, 1500 Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4221-1688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell surface immune checkpoint receptors are objects for therapeutic intervention to stimulate immune cell attack of cancers. Interference between the checking ectodomain (ECD) and the natural ligand lowers constitutive restraints exerted on immune cells. This approach assumes that immune cells can do more, that a checkpoint blocker will make immune cells more effective at killing cancer cells, and that checkpoint molecules might have limited physiological roles. These assumptions may be warranted, as in the case of checkpoint-blockers towards the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ECD, where clinical outcomes are consistently good. However, this does not appear to be the case for the universally expressed CD47 ECD. Much effort has been directed at engineering molecules that bind to the CD47 ECD to increase T cell and macrophage killing of cancers. But a wealth of clinical data do not indicate strong signals, improved killing, or meaningful survival advantages. This suggests that the CD47 ECD is a subpar target for cancer therapy. Consideration of reasons accounting for the modest benefits realized by molecules that bind to the CD47 ECD in cancer, also known as Plan A, is provided. This is followed by thoughts on what might be done, known as plan B, to identify advantages within the CD47 ECD for modulating tolerance in autoimmune diseases.

Indexed as

CD47 AntigenImmune ToleranceNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansProtein DomainsCD47 AntigenCD47 protein, humanautoimmunitybinding affinitycancerCD47checkpointectodomainHLA-ITSP1

Identifiers

PMID41511354
PMCPMC12786138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.