ReviewCells2025
CAR-NK Engineering to Overcome TME Barriers.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-module aCAR-iCAR NK cells for solid tumors: cascade resistance mechanisms, AI-driven engineering, and precision stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Functional genomics-guided design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies in hematological malignancies: aligning cellular engineering with immune escape and microenvironmental resistance.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Advancements and expanding applications of CAR-T cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advances in chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer cell therapy: from mechanisms and preclinical studies to clinical application.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based immunotherapy has shown considerable promise in cancer treatment by redirecting immune effector cells to recognize and eliminate tumor cells in an antigen-specific manner. While CAR-T cells bearing tumor-specific CARs have shown remarkable success in treating some hematological malignancies, their clinical application is limited by cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and graft-versus-host disease. In contrast, CAR-natural killer (NK) cells retain their multiple forms of natural anti-tumor capabilities without the pathological side effects and are compatible with allogeneic "off-the-shelf" application by not requiring prior activation signaling. Despite CAR-NK therapies showing promising results in hematological malignancies, they remain limited as effector cells against solid tumors. This is primarily due to the complex, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), characterized by hypoxia, nutrient depletion, lactate-induced acidosis, and inhibitory soluble factors. Collectively, these significantly impair NK cell functionality. This review examines challenges faced by CAR-NK therapy in combating solid tumors and outlines strategies to reduce them. Barriers include tumor antigen heterogeneity, immune escape, trogocytosis-mediated fratricide, rigid structural and metabolic barriers in the TME, immunosuppressive factors, and defective homing and cell persistence of CAR-NK cells. We also emphasize the impact of combining other complementary immunotherapies (e.g., multi-specific immune engagers and immunomodulatory agents) that further strengthen CAR-NK efficacy. Finally, we highlight critical research gaps in CAR-NK therapy and propose that cutting-edge technologies are required for successful clinical translation in solid tumor treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.