Observational studyEuropean journal of public health2026
Real-world comparative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 primary vaccination campaigns against SARS-CoV-2 infections: a federated observational study emulating a target trial in three nations.
Observational study in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the impact of large-scale severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination campaigns in real-world settings across regions, we performed a reproducible cross-border comparison of the real-world effectiveness of primary vaccination in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections across three sites: Aragon (Spain), Brussels and Wallonia (Belgium), and Finland. This observational study emulated a target trial by daily matching primary vaccinated individuals 1:1 to un- or partially vaccinated individuals using propensity scores estimated on a set of relevant confounders from January to September 2021. Matched individuals were followed up until a SARS-CoV-2 infection was contracted or a censoring event occurred. Vaccine effectiveness in preventing infections was estimated by the difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST). Primary vaccination extended the average free-of-infection time by 35.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) (34.9-37.0)], 59.6 [95% CI (59.3-60.0)], and 1.6 [95% CI (1.1-2.0)] days over 365 days in the population cohort of Aragon (Spain), Brussels and Wallonia (Belgium), and Finland, respectively. This federated population-based observational study showed the effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 primary vaccination campaign in prolonging the mean time to infection in the Aragon (Spain) and Brussels and Wallonia (Belgium) population cohorts. Only a minor difference over this time frame was found in Finland's population cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.