Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511061›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025

Discontinuation, switching and contraceptive failure patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive users in Kenya: a quantitative study.

Midanna de Almada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Midanna de AlmadaPhD Candidate, Department of Methodology, London School of Economics, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of IUD and implant (long-acting reversible contraceptive) users in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing. Yet, little is known about LARC users' experiences and their discontinuation, switching, and failure rates. Contraceptive behaviours can support our understanding of users' experiences and whether these methods meet their needs; this understanding can inform user-centred contraceptive programming and decision-making. This study applies event history analysis and life tables to the Kenyan Demographic and Health Survey contraceptive calendar data to examine LARC users' behaviours and patterns compared to users of other methods. It also measures pregnancy outcomes following contraceptive failure by the method that failed. Results show that contraceptive failure may be under-estimated due to an underreporting or misreporting of failure. Alongside self-reported failure, this analysis uses a derived failure code, which finds that LARC typical-use failure rates may be higher than reported in other studies. LARC users are less likely to switch or discontinue methods compared to other contraceptive method users. However, early LARC discontinuation due to a desire to conceive increases with duration of use. Additionally, LARC users are more likely to experience pregnancy termination following method failure than users of other contraceptive methods. This study has implications for bodily and contraceptive autonomy, contraceptive user's experiences, user-centred contraceptive counselling, and the provision of maternal health and abortion services.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansKenyaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeYoung Adultcontraceptive discontinuationcontraceptive dynamicscontraceptive failurelong-acting reversible contraceptivespregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41511061
PMCPMC12997378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.