ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Discontinuation, switching and contraceptive failure patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive users in Kenya: a quantitative study.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of IUD and implant (long-acting reversible contraceptive) users in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing. Yet, little is known about LARC users' experiences and their discontinuation, switching, and failure rates. Contraceptive behaviours can support our understanding of users' experiences and whether these methods meet their needs; this understanding can inform user-centred contraceptive programming and decision-making. This study applies event history analysis and life tables to the Kenyan Demographic and Health Survey contraceptive calendar data to examine LARC users' behaviours and patterns compared to users of other methods. It also measures pregnancy outcomes following contraceptive failure by the method that failed. Results show that contraceptive failure may be under-estimated due to an underreporting or misreporting of failure. Alongside self-reported failure, this analysis uses a derived failure code, which finds that LARC typical-use failure rates may be higher than reported in other studies. LARC users are less likely to switch or discontinue methods compared to other contraceptive method users. However, early LARC discontinuation due to a desire to conceive increases with duration of use. Additionally, LARC users are more likely to experience pregnancy termination following method failure than users of other contraceptive methods. This study has implications for bodily and contraceptive autonomy, contraceptive user's experiences, user-centred contraceptive counselling, and the provision of maternal health and abortion services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.