ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2026
Validation and standardization of the Childhood Trauma Screener among Romanian children, adolescents, and college students.
Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood trauma, defined as violence against individuals under 18 years of age, affects 1,000,000,000 children globally, with neglect being the most common form. Such trauma is linked to various mental health issues and poor emotional regulation. This study aimed to validate the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) in a sample of Romanian children, adolescents, and college students, utilizing data from two separate samples: 1,221 first-year college students and 216 children and adolescents aged 8-16 years. We assessed validity using bivariate correlations, reliability using Cronbach's alpha (.63-.75), and structure using confirmatory factor analyses. In the college student sample, higher childhood trauma scores were associated with lower self-compassion, rs = -.24--.29, p < .001, and reappraisal use, rs = -.10--.22, p < .001; higher suppression use for exposure to neglect, r = .16, p < .001, and overall trauma, r = -.11, p < .001; and more mental health difficulties, rs = .29-.31, p < .001. In the child and adolescent sample, higher childhood trauma scores were associated with increased emotional and behavioral difficulties, rs = .28-.45, p < .001, and poorer emotion regulation abilities, particularly lower emotion control and reduced emotional self-awareness, rs = .16-.43, p < .001. The results from both samples supported a two-factor model of abuse and neglect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.