ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Early versus late termination for fetal anomalies: Women's perspectives and psychological impact in a mixed methods study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of National Screening Programs on Down syndrome prevalence and outcomes.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Preferences of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals on First-Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA frequently cited benefit of the first-trimester anomaly scan (FTAS) is that it reduces psychological impact by enabling earlier termination of pregnancy (TOP). However, the impact of early versus late TOP due to fetal anomalies remains unclear. This study evaluates the psychological impact and perspectives associated with early versus late TOP. MATERIAL AND
methodsA prospective mixed methods study was conducted. The early group (TOP <18 weeks) included women with an abnormal FTAS; the late group (TOP 20-24 weeks) included women with an abnormal second-trimester scan (SAS), abnormal FTAS, or normal FTAS followed by abnormal SAS. Women completed questionnaires 2 (T1) and 6 months (T2) postpartum addressing psychological impact using validated scales (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Edinburgh Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, Perinatal Grief Scale) and study-specific questions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women and their partners 3-6 months after termination.
results149 women with early TOP (15 + 2 weeks, range 14 + 4-16 + 1) and 129 with late TOP (22 + 0, 21 + 0-23 + 1) completed T1. In both groups, the majority had clinically relevant anxiety at T1 and T2 and moderate/severe distress at T1. The late TOP group had higher median depression and mean grief scores at T1 (5.0, range 3.0-8.0 vs. 4.0, range 2.0-7.0, p = 0.004) (85.9 ± 21.0 vs. 76.5 ± 22.4, p < 0.001) and at T2 (4.0, 1.0-7.0 vs. 3.0, 1.0-6.0, p = 0.043) (81.3 ± 22.9 vs. 70.8 ± 22.6, p < 0.001), respectively, and higher mean distress scores at T1 (33.8 ± 13.3 vs. 30.2 ± 14.7, p = 0.034). Of 51 interviews with women and partners (22 early, 29 late TOP), four themes were identified: fetal attachment, time pressure, grief, and reflections on gestational age. Most late TOP participants expressed strong fetal attachment; for early TOP participants, the experiences were more variable. Half of the late TOP participants reported time pressure due to the legal limit. Perceived grief and impact were substantial in both groups.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that early TOP is associated with lower psychological impact compared to late TOP, mainly in the first months postpartum. This may reflect less intense fetal attachment and more time for reproductive decision-making for some parents, supporting the presumed benefit of earlier intervention. Nevertheless, TOP causes a significant emotional impact at any gestational age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.