ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026
Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Myotonometric Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Caesarean Section Scar Skin Using the MyotonPRO With an L-Shaped Probe.
Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Myotonometric Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Caesarean Section Scar Skin Using the MyotonPRO With an L-Shaped Probe.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026Article
- The Role of Biomechanical Regulation in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy: From Mechanotransduction to Clinical Implications.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyotonometry is a noninvasive method for assessing the mechanical properties of soft tissues, including muscles and skin. The L-shaped probe, designed specifically for skin assessment, may be useful for evaluating caesarean section (C-section) scars. However, reliability data for MyotonPRO measurements of C-section scars with this probe are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measuring the mechanical properties of C-section scar skin using the MyotonPRO with the L-shaped probe. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-five women (23-42 years) with C-section scars were examined. Two raters conducted the myotonometric assessments over two consecutive days. Measurements were taken with the participant supine, using the L-shaped probe at six points around the scar (three above, three below; positioned at the scar's endpoints and centre), each tested in three directions (right, left and upward/downward). Reliability was analysed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), coefficient of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsInter-rater reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.75-0.90), while intra-rater reliability was moderate to good, with slightly lower ICCs for consecutive-day measurements. SEM, MDC and CV values supported these findings, showing lower measurement error and narrower variability ranges between raters than within repeated measurements by the same rater.
conclusionThe MyotonPRO with the L-shaped probe provides reliable inter- and intra-rater measurements of C-section scar skin mechanical properties, making it a valuable tool for scar evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.