ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2026
An Updated Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Study of Drug- Induced Breast Cancer Based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Data.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo address critical knowledge gaps in understanding drug-specific risk profiles of breast cancer (BC), ultimately informing regulatory decision-making and clinical practice.
methodsThis study conducted a retrospective drug safety study based on the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, examining BC drug treatment data from 2004 to 2024. The research involved data cleaning, standardization of drug names, and the application of statistical analysis methods such as the proportional imbalance method and the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) to assess potential associations between drugs and adverse events.
resultsSignificant differences were determined in adverse reaction reports among different drugs in BC treatment. Specific drugs such as trastuzumab, lapatinib, and certain endocrine therapy medications accounted for a higher proportion of adverse event reports and exhibited higher ROR values. Additionally, the study identified that cardiotoxicity, osteoporosis, ovarian function impairment, and immune complications are adverse reactions requiring special attention in BC drug treatment. DISCUSSION: This comprehensive analysis of FAERS data highlights the significance in drug-induced adverse event reporting across BC therapies. This work promotes the advancement of patient safety by providing actionable evidence for therapeutic decision making in the oncology of BC. A limitation of this study is the lack of integration of potential mechanisms for adverse events in BC patients.
conclusionTargeted therapies of lapatinib, fulvestrant, and endocrine agents (letrozole or ribociclib) show disproportionately high AE reporting odds ratios, necessitating vigilant monitoring. HER2-positive BC treatments (trastuzumab) and TNBC agents (sonidegib) exhibit distinct risk profiles, advocating for personalized risk-benefit assessments for BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41510738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.