ArticleAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry2026
Molecular Simulation, Pharmacophore Mapping, and 3D QSAR Modeling on Chromene-Based SERDs.
Article in Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal computational discovery of MvfR inhibitors targeting quorum sensing in multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEstrogen receptor (ERα) is known to be a legitimate therapeutic target for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer. Although selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) like fulvestrant suppress ER signaling, their limited bioavailability challenges efficacy. Additionally, activating mutations in the ERα mediate resistance to endocrine therapy.
methodsTo elucidate the structural activity relationship within a chromene-based scaffold, we conducted pharmacophore mapping and Gaussian field-based 3D QSAR modelling. The most active analogue was docked into the ERα ligand binding domain (PDB ID: 6V8T) and then subjected to molecular dynamics simulations and molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/ GBSA) binding-free energy calculations.
resultsThe pharmacophore mapping produces a five-point hypothesis, of which HHHRR_1 achieved the highest survival score (6.423) with a fitness score close to 3. Using HHHRR_1, a Gaussian Field-based 3D QSAR model with strong internal predictivity (cross-validated q DISCUSSION: The integrated modelling approach, like pharmacophore mapping, 3D QSAR, docking, and molecular dynamics, elucidated molecular characteristics essential for potent ERα degradation. Compound 18, having superior binding affinities, implies that optimizing these features on a chromene scaffold can yield new oral SERDs with enhanced therapeutic potential.
conclusionBased on the results of pharmacophore mapping, docking, molecular simulation, and 3D QSAR studies, we have designed a new set of chromene scaffold-based derivatives as potent SERDs along with their predicted activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41510727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.