ArticleInternational endodontic journal2026
Photon-Counting CT for Diagnosing Vertical Root Fractures in Teeth With Metal Posts: An Ex Vivo Comparative Analysis With Four CBCT Devices.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photon-Counting Detector CT-Based Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging With Metal Artifact Reduction for Endodontic Diagnostics.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePhoton-counting computed tomography (PCCT) represents a major innovation in X-ray detection technology, offering improved signal efficiency and reduced electronic noise compared with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), which can enhance image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PCCT in detecting vertical root fractures (VRF), in comparison with four CBCT devices. METHODOLOGY: Eighteen single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated, and VRF was induced in eight of them. Each tooth was individually placed into the mandibular first premolar empty socket of an anthropomorphic phantom and scanned under three conditions: without a metal post, with a nickel-chromium metal post (Ni-Cr), and with a cobalt-chromium metal post (Co-Cr) in five CT devices: the NAEOTOM Alpha PCCT (Siemens Healthineers) device and four CBCT devices (3D Accuitomo 170-Morita, Veraview X800-Morita, NewTom VGi evo-NewTom, and Carestream 9600-Carestream). The highest-resolution protocol available on each device was used, resulting in a total of 270 scans. Five experienced dentomaxillofacial radiologists independently and blindly evaluated the scans using a five-point confidence scale. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, with results compared by two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
resultsNewTom VGi and PCCT devices showed significantly higher AUC values than the Veraview X800, regardless of the metal post material (p < 0.05). CS9600 and PCCT devices exhibited significantly higher sensitivity values in diagnosing with Ni-Cr posts than the Accuitomo 3D and Veraview X800 devices (p < 0.05). With the Co-Cr metal post, the NewTom VGi, CS9600, and PCCT devices showed significantly higher sensitivity values compared to the Veraview X800 device (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in specificity, regardless of the CT device or metal post material (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThe NEAOTOM Alpha PCCT showed high diagnostic accuracy for VRF detection in an ex vivo model, comparable to high-resolution CBCT devices, highlighting its diagnostic performance under controlled ex vivo conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.