Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510613›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.

Vani Gupta, Nicole Santos, Sara Della Ripa, Dilys Walker

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vani GuptaUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4156-5868
Nicole SantosInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sara Della RipaInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dilys WalkerInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV00325081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO recommends that all pregnant women receive an ultrasound (US) scan prior to 24 weeks gestation to encourage early identification of various conditions, such as fetal anomalies, multiple gestation, and placental abnormalities; however, global access to US remains limited. This has prompted many research groups to develop artificial intelligence (AI) approaches for obstetric US.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to update and synthesize current literature regarding the development of AI algorithms for obstetric US. SEARCH STRATEGY: Methods were modified from Horgan et al. scoping review on the progress of AI algorithms for obstetric US. Our search, which encompassed papers published between 1991 and May 2022, adapted Horgan's search strategy by replicating the search strings across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov databases, while also snowballing additional references. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies included both AI and obstetric US with a focus on one or more maternal and/or fetal conditions between January 2022 and January 2024. After removing duplicates, publications were screened for inclusion criteria based on their mention of both AI and obstetric US and a main objective assessing maternal and/or fetal conditions. Studies were excluded if they failed to mention the use of AI or obstetric ultrasound, discussed AI algorithm development, or consisted of expert opinions, reviews, and abstracts. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used Zotero to manage references and extracted data onto an Excel template. The remaining publications were reviewed for data extraction including-authors, dates, objectives, settings, and funding sources. Publications were categorized into seven main areas based on Horgan's framework, with additional subcategories for emerging topics. Descriptive statistics summarized the data, with graphical visualizations depicting the geographic distribution of studies. MAIN

resultsA total of 96 articles were included in the final results, revealing the rapid increase in the number of publications related to AI in obstetrics. The greatest proportion of studies were categorized as fetal biometry (25%) and anatomical evaluation of the fetus (20%). Studies took place across multiple regions with the greatest number in Asia (41%) and Europe (27%). A total of 22% were conducted in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs).

conclusionThis scoping review demonstrates the growth and development of AI-enabled obstetric US applications. There is a wide variety of innovative applications on the horizon and implementation approaches and implications should be explored as these technologies become clinically available. We encourage development of algorithms that focus on parameters that identify conditions linked to the global burden of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, such as gestational age and placental location.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUltrasonography, PrenatalAlgorithmsFemaleHumansPregnancyartificial intelligencefetalmaternalobstetricscopingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41510613
PMCPMC13278657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.