ReviewTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2025
All arterial versus non-total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this meta-analysis, we compare total arterial revascularization versus non-total arterial revascularization coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients and discuss long-term survival rate and early mortality rate, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, sternal wound infection. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Thieme-Connect and Sage Pub databases for studies which were published from January 2003 to October 2023. Observational studies with propensity-score matched analysis comparing total arterial revascularization versus non-total arterial revascularization coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients were included. The risk of bias was analyzed. Fixed-effects model and random-effects meta-analysis with leave-one-out method as sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: Six observational studies which were published involving a total of 15,336 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the long-term survival rates and early myocardial infarction. Total arterial revascularization had higher survival rate (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.98, p=0.02) and lower myocardial infarction event than non-total arterial revascularization (odds ratio [OR]=0.45, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92, p=0.03). Conclusion: Total arterial revascularization is significantly associated with higher survival rate and lower early myocardial infarction than non-total arterial revascularization in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.