Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510520›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Cognitive sequences in obsessive-compulsive disorder are supported by frontal cortex ramping activity.

Hannah Doyle, Nicole C R McLaughlin, Sarah L Garnaat, Theresa M Desrochers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah DoyleDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-2883
Nicole C R McLaughlinDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Sarah L GarnaatDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Theresa M DesrochersDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7223-0556

Funding

Neuroimaging and Neuromodulation CoreP20GM130452 · NIGMS · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI VAN 'T WOUT-FRANK, MASCHA · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
Testing neural mechanisms of sequence monitoring in the frontal cortex across species: integrated fMRI and electrophysiologyR01MH131615 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Theresa Marie Desrochers · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Training Program for Interactionist Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN)T32MH115895 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL J. FRANK, STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130452NIH HHS S10 OD025181NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131615NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Completing sequences is a routine part of daily life. Many are abstract, defined by a rule governing the order rather than the identity of individual steps (e.g., getting dressed). In obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), excessive ritualistic behaviors suggest a disruption in abstract sequence completion. Executing abstract sequences requires at least two levels in a hierarchy of cognitive control: abstract sequential control (tracking steps) and task switching (shifting between tasks). While task switching has been studied in OCD, little is known in a sequential context. Understanding both hierarchical control types is key to uncovering how abstract sequences with nested task switches are processed in OCD. Previous studies showed that the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) supports abstract sequence monitoring in healthy individuals with an increase in activity across each sequence, a dynamic known as "ramping". Ramping outside the RLPFC is potentially indicative of other sequence-related processes such as progress toward a goal and increasing working memory load. Therefore, we hypothesized that abstract sequential control deficits would correspond to altered ramping dynamics in RLPFC and other cortical regions. Second, we predicted task switching deficits in OCD, coupled with altered activity in cortical regions canonically implicated in task level control. We found partial support for both hypotheses. Abstract sequential control did not show behavioral differences in OCD but did show increased overall ramping in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and superior frontal sulcus (SFS) and ramping differences in additional, novel cortical regions according to abstract sequence complexity. In contrast, behavioral differences were observed for task switching in OCD without neural differences between the groups. Together, these results suggest a group of areas support sequential control differentially in OCD than in healthy controls, despite behavioral similarity, and that this observation is likely not the result of neural deficits in task switching. These findings, thus, provide insight into OCD during complex behaviors more similar to daily life where sequence and task level control are intertwined and may inform future potential treatment.

Indexed as

behaviorcognitivefMRIprefrontalsequencestask-switching

Identifiers

PMID41510520
PMCPMC12776618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.