ArticleCureus2025
Leveraging Healthcare Analytics to Uncover Social Determinants of Health Disparities in Congestive Heart Failure.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Congestive heart failure (CHF) is shaped by both clinical risk factors and social determinants of health (SDOH), which influence disease progression, medication adherence, and care access. As healthcare systems incorporate SDOH screening into routine electronic health record (EHR) workflows, understanding the relationship between social needs and CHF outcomes is critical for risk stratification and population management. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using 30,534 inpatient EHR records, including 7,618 patients with CHF and 22,916 without CHF. Associations between CHF status and SDOH variables were examined using chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated adjusted predictors of CHF, and a Random Forest (RF) classifier assessed predictive importance of SDOH and demographic features. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to address class imbalance. Hierarchical clustering was performed to identify patterns of co-occurring social needs. Results Patients with CHF were significantly older and more frequently male and Black compared with patients without CHF (p < 0.001). Age was the strongest predictor of CHF, with adjusted odds increasing nearly tenfold among individuals aged ≥75 years compared with younger adults. Depression registry entry and financial insecurity increased odds, whereas being married or living with a partner was protective. All SDOH were significantly associated with CHF except tobacco use, although effect sizes were small. Random Forest achieved moderate performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.67, balanced accuracy = 62%), with age, transportation barriers, and physical activity ranking as top predictors. Clustering revealed distinct subgroups, including patients with co-occurring depression, alcohol use, stress, and another characterized by financial strain, food insecurity, and transportation limitations. Conclusion Demographic and social conditions contribute meaningfully to CHF burden, with age, socioeconomic stressors, and psychosocial vulnerability emerging as key factors. Despite small individual effect sizes, collective SDOH patterns demonstrated clinical relevance and predictive utility. Integrating SDOH variables into analytic models, supported by machine learning and oversampling techniques such as SMOTE, provides a scalable approach to improve CHF risk stratification and guide targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.