Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510462›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Occult Tethered Cord Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Challenges, and Management Considerations.

Michihiro Kurimoto

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michihiro KurimotoPediatric Neurosurgery, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Ōbu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occult tethered cord syndrome (OTCS) is defined as the clinical manifestation of a tethered cord without radiographic evidence of a low-lying conus; however, there is no consensus on surgical indications or evaluation criteria. We present three cases treated surgically at our hospital, and in contrast to that, a narrative review of the literature on OTCS was conducted, focusing on epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnostic tools, and surgical versus conservative management. Emphasis was placed on pediatric populations, in whom the syndrome is most frequently described. Between April 2010 and June 2025, three patients with OTCS underwent surgical sectioning of the filum terminale at our institution. All patients presented with urological abnormalities, and one patient also demonstrated orthopedic involvement. Improvement in urological symptoms was observed in two patients (66%), including resolution of vesicoureteral reflux and nocturnal enuresis, whereas no improvement was noted in orthopedic abnormalities. No perioperative complications were observed. During the follow-up period (median (interquartile range) = 1281 (1264-1490) days), these results indicated that while urinary symptoms after surgical dislocation were highly likely to recover, orthopedic symptoms remained largely refractory in the majority of cases. OTCS remains controversial and heterogeneous. Diagnosis depends largely on clinical judgment, and treatment decisions must balance the potential surgical benefits with the risks and uncertain long-term outcomes. Prospective controlled studies and the development of objective biomarkers are essential for establishing standardized diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines.

Indexed as

filum terminaleoccult tethered cord syndromepediatric neurosurgeryspinal dysraphismsurgical outcomesurodynamics

Identifiers

PMID41510462
PMCPMC12779360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.