Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510393›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Additional 1.1-mm cryobiopsy trial guided by rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of touch imprint cytology result of small forceps biopsy in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a prospective single-center study.

Yuki Takigawa, Ken Sato, Suzuka Matsuoka, Mayu Goda, Keisuke Shiraha, Takeru Ichikawa, Shoichiro Matsumoto, Tomoyoshi Inoue, Miho Fujiwara, Jun Nishimura and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yuki TakigawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-0423
Ken SatoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Suzuka MatsuokaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Mayu GodaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Keisuke ShirahaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Takeru IchikawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Shoichiro MatsumotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Tomoyoshi InoueDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Miho FujiwaraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Jun NishimuraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Hiromi WatanabeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Kenichiro KudoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Akiko SatoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Tetsuya IsodaDepartment of Pathology, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Yoko ShinnoDepartment of Pathology, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Keiichi FujiwaraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Takuo ShibayamaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, NHO Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultrathin cryobiopsy (CB) using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). However, CB may not be actively adopted in some institutions because of concerns about bleeding and pneumothorax. Each facility needs to develop its own strategies to perform CB selectively and safely. Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of touch imprint cytology (ROSE-TIC) of small (1.5 mm) forceps biopsy (FB) may help guide the selective application of CB. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding CB in patients with ROSE-TIC-negative FB. Methods: Patients with PPLs <30 mm were enrolled in this single-center prospective study. First, they underwent bronchoscopic biopsy with a 1.5-mm FB and ROSE-TIC. CB using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe was added only when the ROSE-TIC of the FB was negative. Safety outcomes (especially bleeding) and diagnostic yields were compared solely between ROSE-TIC-positive and ROSE-TIC-negative groups. In addition, the diagnostic yield of FB results, regardless of ROSE-TIC positivity or negativity, was evaluated. The specimen sizes and ROSE-TIC accuracies were also assessed. Results: From November 2023 to March 2025, 50 patients underwent bronchoscopic examinations according to the intended protocol. Grade ≥3 bleeding events did not occur, and Grade 1-2 bleeding was not significantly different between the ROSE-TIC-positive and ROSE-TIC-negative groups (P=0.35). The specific diagnostic yield of the ROSE-TIC-positive group was 87.5%, and that of the ROSE-TIC-negative group was 73.l%. In the ROSE-TIC-negative group, the FB-only results made a specific diagnosis in 34.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.2-55.7%] compared with combined CB in 73.1% (95% CI: 44.3-82.8%). The overall diagnostic yield of specific findings was significantly higher in the combined CB group than that in the FB group (80% Conclusions: The selective addition of a 1.1-mm CB based on ROSE-TIC results of FB is a safe, feasible, and effective strategy for improving the specific diagnostic yield. This approach may be particularly beneficial for small PPLs of ≤20 mm.

Indexed as

1.1-mm cryobiopsy (1.1-mm CB)rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of touch imprint cytology (ROSE-TIC)ultrathin cryobiopsy (ultrathin CB)

Identifiers

PMID41510393
PMCPMC12775705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.