ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
No Difference in Tibial Tubercle Trochlear Groove Distance Between Patients With and Without a History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a known risk factor for patellar instability, but its role in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is unclear. Previous studies found an increased TT-TG distance in patients with noncontact ACL tears compared with patients with intact ACLs. Hypothesis: The authors hypothesize that there will be a significantly increased TT-TG distance in patients with ACL injury compared with patients without ACL injury. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients aged 18 to 50 years who had noncontact ACL tears between 2020 and 2021 were included in this study. Patients with ACL tears were compared with a similar cohort of patients with meniscal tears, matched for age and sex, between 2020 and 2021. Patients were excluded if preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was unavailable. One author reviewed axial images to measure TT-TG distance. An independent 1-tailed Results: The TT-TG distance was measured for 299 patients, of whom 159 had an ACL injury and 140 patients had intact ACLs. Patients with an ACL injury had a mean TT-TG distance of 11.3 ± 4.10 mm, and patients without ACL injury had a mean TT-TG distance of 11.9 ± 4.62 mm. There was no significant difference in TT-TG distance between the 2 groups ( Conclusion: No statistically significant difference in TT-TG distance was found between patients with and without ACL injury. The findings of this study do not support an association between TT-TG distance and ACL deficiency. Instead, TT-TG distance may vary as a result of ACL injury due to increased laxity in tibial external rotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.