ReviewPhysical therapy research2025
Association between Pre-stroke Frailty and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Physical therapy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frailty Index and Risk of Ischemic Stroke in China: Evidence from a Cohort Study, Disease Burden Analysis, and Mendelian Randomization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between pre-stroke frailty and clinical outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to examine the association of pre-stroke frailty with mortality, length of stay (LOS), and functional outcomes in people with stroke. Methods: We used several databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. We searched for studies investigating the association between pre-stroke frailty and clinical outcomes. The Quality in Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. The certainty of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Fourteen studies (participants: 11583) were included in this review. Pre-stroke frailty is associated with higher mortality (odds ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.0-1.23), longer LOS (mean difference: 0.75; 95% CI: -0.29 to 1.78), and poorer functional outcomes (standardized mean difference: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.48-1.1). The certainty of evidence is low due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Conclusions: These results suggest that frailty before stroke onset may be associated with higher mortality, increased LOS, and poorer functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.