ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Endovascular Treatment and Microsurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Comparative Study.
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial aneurysms pose significant challenges due to their potential to rupture, leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with severe neurological consequences. Endovascular treatment has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to surgical clipping, offering distinct advantages in terms of morbidity and recovery. This study aims to compare the clinical profiles, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors between microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment in the management of intracranial aneurysms. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed 103 patients treated for intracranial aneurysms at a tertiary care institution in North India between January 2018 and December 2023. Of these, 53 underwent microsurgical clipping and 50 underwent endovascular treatment. Data on demographics, clinical presentations, aneurysm characteristics, and treatment details were meticulously collected. Immediate and long-term outcomes, including neurological status and complications, were assessed. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests and Results: The mean age was 52.43 years for the clipping group and 54.42 years for the endovascular treatment group, with no significant difference ( Conclusion: Both endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping are effective treatment modalities for intracranial aneurysms, each with distinct advantages. Endovascular treatment offers a less invasive approach with shorter hospital stays and potentially better long-term outcomes. Microsurgical clipping provides durable aneurysm occlusion and remains critical for complex aneurysms. The choice of treatment should be individualized based on aneurysm characteristics, patient condition, and available expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.