Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510328›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research

Effectiveness and Safety of 75 mg and 150 mg Pregabalin for Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blinded Trial.

M Sashank, Geeta Mittal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M SashankDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Geeta MittalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, DMC and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregabalin is being used as preemptive analgesic for better postoperative pain management. This present study was aimed at comparing effectiveness and safety of 75 mg and 150 mg of oral pregabalin given as premedication 1 h before the surgery. Materials and Methods: This was prospective, randomized, and double-blinded placebo controlled study in which 90 patients were enrolled and randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Groups P75 (given 75 mg pregabalin), P150 (given 150 mg pregabalin) and C (given placebo drug). Postoperative pain and sedation assessment were done. Adverse effects such as somnolence, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting were noted. Results: Pain was lowest in P150 group than P75 and control group at 2 h. The duration of analgesia was highest in the P150 group followed by the P75 group with the control group showing the shortest duration. A significant difference was observed in total tramadol consumption ( Conclusion: Pregabalin is a safe drug and has good analgesic effect. Although the analgesic effectiveness of higher dose, i.e., 150 mg was better, adverse effect in terms of sedation was more. Hence, we suggest pregabalin 75 mg to be used preoperatively as it has demonstrated to have good analgesic effectiveness.

Indexed as

Breast carcinomapostoperative analgesiapreemptive analgesiapregabalin

Identifiers

PMID41510328
PMCPMC12778390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.