Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510319›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026

Optimising acute toxicity monitoring in prostate MR-guided radiotherapy workflow: Results from a prospective study using multiple electronic PRO assessments.

Pia Krause Møller, Helle Pappot, Tine Schytte, Uffe Bernchou, Karin Brochstedt Dieperink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pia Krause MøllerDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense C 5000, Denmark.
Helle PappotDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Tine SchytteDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense C 5000, Denmark.
Uffe BernchouDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M 5230, Denmark.
Karin Brochstedt DieperinkDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense C 5000, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Frequent electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may become an important tool for monitoring outcomes in ultrahypofractionated MRgRT for prostate cancer, enabling real-time remote tracking of toxicity. By integrating weekly ePROs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments into the early prostate MRgRT workflow, this study aimed to explore real-time acute symptom trajectories and the impact on HRQoL. Methods: Two cohorts were followed: Patients receiving MRgRT for localised PCa (60Gy/20fx) or low-volume metastatic (M1) PCa (36Gy/6fx) and eligible to complete weekly ePROs and HRQoL measures (EQ-5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-C30) during and up to 24 weeks of follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate symptom changes over time. Results: Of 76 included PCa patients, 42 had localised PCa and 34 low-volume M1 PCa. The linear model revealed significant changes in urinary symptoms from treatment week one, persisting 2 weeks post-MRgRT in the 36 Gy cohort, and 3-4 weeks in the 60 Gy cohort. Bowel symptoms increased early post-treatment in both cohorts, with diarrhoea being most frequent. Clinically relevant changes in HRQoL were observed during follow-up: patients in the 60 Gy cohort showed HRQoL improvements after 12 and 24 weeks. In the 36 Gy cohort, patients reported improved self-rated Global health status/QoL and emotional functioning. Conclusion: Frequent ePROs during and after MRgRT provide critical insights into the timing, fluctuation and severity of acute toxicity, potentially missed with standard follow-up schedules. Integrating real-time ePROs into the MRgRT workflow is a feasible patient-centered method to systematically optimize the outcome assessments of MRgRT.

Indexed as

ePROMRgRTMR-linacPatient-reported outcomesProstate cancerSymptom trajectory

Identifiers

PMID41510319
PMCPMC12774778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.