ArticleResearch square2025
An Advanced Entropy Approach for Minimizing False Discoveries in Imputation-Based Association Analyses.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genotype imputation is a cornerstone of modern genetic studies, enhancing the resolution of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), fine mapping, and polygenic risk score estimation by inferring untyped variants using reference panels. The output of imputation is a set of probabilistic genotypes, each associated with an inherent degree of uncertainty. However, conventional downstream analyses often overlook this uncertainty, relying instead on allelic dosages-expected allele counts computed from probabilistic genotypes-as proxies. This practice can be misleading, as distinct genotype probability distributions may produce identical dosages despite vastly different confidence levels, potentially introducing bias and inflating false discoveries. To address this limitation, we introduce an entropy-weighted association method that explicitly quantifies imputation uncertainty using Shannon entropy. These entropy values are integrated as observation-level weights within the association model, allowing the method to dynamically account for the reliability of each imputed genotype. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that this approach substantially reduces false positives, especially when genotypic uncertainty is pronounced. Our findings highlight the importance of modeling imputation uncertainty and offer a framework that improves the robustness of GWAS and other genotype imputation-dependent analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.