Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510290›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

An Advanced Entropy Approach for Minimizing False Discoveries in Imputation-Based Association Analyses.

Zhihui Zhang, Dakai Zhu, Xiangjun Xiao, Christopher I Amos

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhihui ZhangDan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Dakai ZhuDan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Xiangjun XiaoDan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Christopher I AmosDan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Translating Molecular and Clinical Data to Population Lung Cancer Risk AssessmentU19CA203654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Rayjean J. Hung · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Precision approaches to refining TP53-associated cancer riskR01CA242218 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., GARBER, JUDY E. · 2019 to 2023
$8.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242218NCI NIH HHS U19 CA203654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputation is a cornerstone of modern genetic studies, enhancing the resolution of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), fine mapping, and polygenic risk score estimation by inferring untyped variants using reference panels. The output of imputation is a set of probabilistic genotypes, each associated with an inherent degree of uncertainty. However, conventional downstream analyses often overlook this uncertainty, relying instead on allelic dosages-expected allele counts computed from probabilistic genotypes-as proxies. This practice can be misleading, as distinct genotype probability distributions may produce identical dosages despite vastly different confidence levels, potentially introducing bias and inflating false discoveries. To address this limitation, we introduce an entropy-weighted association method that explicitly quantifies imputation uncertainty using Shannon entropy. These entropy values are integrated as observation-level weights within the association model, allowing the method to dynamically account for the reliability of each imputed genotype. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that this approach substantially reduces false positives, especially when genotypic uncertainty is pronounced. Our findings highlight the importance of modeling imputation uncertainty and offer a framework that improves the robustness of GWAS and other genotype imputation-dependent analyses.

Indexed as

Dosage-based methodsEntropy weightingGenotype imputationGWAS power and FDR

Identifiers

PMID41510290
PMCPMC12776520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.