Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510285›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Unveiling Population Heterogeneity in Health Risks Posed by Environmental Hazards Using Regression-Guided Neural Network.

Jong Woo Nam, Eun Young Choi, Jennifer A Ailshire, Yao-Yi Chiang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jong Woo NamNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California.
Eun Young ChoiLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California.
Jennifer A AilshireLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California.
Yao-Yi ChiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota.

Funding

USC/UCLA Center on Biodemography &Population HealthP30AG017265 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ · 1999 to 2026
$17.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As environmental hazards become more frequent, it is critically important to understand their health impacts and identify individuals at disproportionately higher risk. Moderated Multiple Regression (MMR) provides a straightforward approach for investigating population heterogeneity by incorporating interaction terms between hazard exposure and population characteristics into a regression model. However, when vulnerabilities are embedded within complex, high-dimensional covariate spaces, MMR often fails to adequately model complex population heterogeneity. Here, we introduce a hybrid method, Regression-Guided Neural Networks (ReGNN), which integrates the flexibility of artificial neural networks (ANNs) within the structural form of a regression model. Briefly, ReGNN embeds an ANN inside a regression equation to generate a latent representation that nonlinearly combines potential sources of heterogeneity and moderates the effect of an environmental hazard. Because the outer layer maintains a regression structure, the interpretability of standard regression analysis is preserved. Through extensive simulation studies, we demonstrate ReGNN's effectiveness in modeling complex heterogeneous effects. We further illustrate its utility by applying it to investigate population heterogeneity in the health impacts of air pollution (PM2.5) on cognitive functioning scores. By comparing ReGNN's results with those from traditional MMR models, we show that ReGNN can uncover patterns of heterogeneity that would otherwise remain hidden.

Identifiers

PMID41510285
PMCPMC12776524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.