Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510219›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2025

Redesigning Advanced Life Support teaching and assessment using a constructive alignment approach.

Sophie Moll, Nico Tannemann, Margarita Gestmann, Thorsten Brenner, Frank Herbstreit, Cynthia Szalai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie MollDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Nico TannemannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Margarita GestmannFaculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Frank HerbstreitDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Cynthia SzalaiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8308-3814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced Life Support (ALS) is a crucial component of medical training. Previously, a single-person OSCE-Station (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) was used to assess these skills, focusing primarily on the team leader role and emphasizing theoretical knowledge. However, students demonstrated deficiencies in key algorithm-compliant practical skills, such as cardiac massage, mask ventilation and defibrillator use, and struggled to integrate into a team-based resuscitation approach. To address this, a constructive alignment approach was used to revise the course and offer a guideline-appropriate, three-person resuscitation model. Learning outcomes and assessment targets were aligned with the course activities to increase student engagement and increase desired skill attainment. In the summer semester 2023, students and lecturers were briefed on the new structure of the course and assessment, specific skills were highlighted, and a model video was provided. The OSCE format was adjusted to assess both practical and non-technical skills. In the new setup, each student was randomly assigned one of three roles and assessed using role-specific checklists with defined criteria, focusing on non-technical and practical abilities. Course activity included training and practice in the three-person resuscitation approach. A team OSCE (tOSCE) approach for assessment was used, with one student for each role being examined. Results indicated both subjective and objective markers of satisfaction in course activities and tOSCE results. A team-based OSCE station proves effective for teaching combined practical and non-technical competencies.

Indexed as

Advanced Life Supportconstructive alignmentTeam OSCE

Identifiers

PMID41510219
PMCPMC12775656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.