ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2025
Predicting Partially Observed Long-Term Outcomes with Adversarial Positive-Unlabeled Domain Adaptation.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting long-term clinical outcomes often requires large-scale training data with sufficiently long follow-up. However, in electronic health records (EHR) data, long-term labels may not be available for contemporary patient cohorts. Given the dynamic nature of clinical practice, models that rely on historical training data may not perform optimally. In this work, we frame the problem as a positive-unlabeled domain adaptation task, where we seek to adapt from a fully labeled source domain (e.g., historical data) to a partially labeled target domain (e.g., contemporary data). We propose an adversarial framework that includes three core components: (1) Overall Alignment, to match feature distributions between source and target domains; (2) Partial Alignment, to map source negatives to unlabeled target samples; and (3) Conditional Alignment, to address conditional shift using available positive labels in the target domain. We evaluate our method on a benchmark digit classification task (SVHN-MNIST), and two real-world EHR applications: prediction of one-year mortality post COVID-19, and long-term prediction of neurodevelopmental conditions (NDC) in children. In all settings, our approach consistently outperforms baseline models and, in most cases, achieves performance close to an oracle model trained with fully observed labels.
Identifiers
41510190PMC12779109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.