Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510177›Full record

ArticleSSM. Mental health2025

Measurement invariance of the perceived discrimination scale across race/ethnicity and sex: Findings from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.

Shu Xu, Keith F Widaman, Cindy Patippe, Luchang Cui, Xinnuo Shi, Danielle M Krobath, Adolfo Cuevas, Virginia W Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shu XuSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6968-1674
Keith F WidamanSchool of Education, University of California, Riverside, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6424-3998
Cindy PatippeSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-5691-0580
Luchang CuiSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-6219-3920
Xinnuo ShiSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-8349-6279
Danielle M KrobathArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-5302
Adolfo CuevasSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9875-3825
Virginia W ChangSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-6989

Funding

Assessing The Impact of Neighborhood and Interpersonal Discrimination on Obesity and Leukocyte Gene ExpressionR01DK137246 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Adolfo Cuevas · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
The Impact of Psychosocial Stress on Anthropometric Outcomes: An Analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) StudyR01MD019251 · NIMHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Adolfo Cuevas · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK137246NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD019251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perceived racial discrimination during childhood and adolescence is a critical social determinant of health disparities. However, few scales measure perceived racial discrimination in these age groups, and even fewer are validated with robust psychometric properties or demonstrate measurement invariance across racial and ethnic or sex groups. Objective: This study examines the psychometric properties of the Perceived Discrimination (PD) scale, a seven-item questionnaire designed to assess societal rejection based on racial or ethnic background among youth. Methods: Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to examine youth-reported perceived discrimination across racial/ethnic groups (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and NH Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander) and sex groups (male and female). These analyses drew on two data sets: one based on youth's racial/ethnicity reported by parents (Data Set 1, n = 9967) and the other based on self-reported race/ethnicity (Data Set 2, n = 7645). Results: Analyses identified a well-fitting bi-factor model, comprising a general perceived discrimination factor and a specific perceived social exclusion factor, demonstrating high reliability. The general perceived discrimination factor exhibited strong predictive validity, effectively forecasting changes in mental health outcomes over a one-year interval. Results from multi-group confirmatory factor analysis support the configural, weak, and strong measurement invariance of the PD scale across racial/ethnic and sex groups. Sensitivity analyses affirmed the robustness of these findings, showing consistency across reporting types (parent-vs. self-reporting for youth race/ethnicity) and coding strategies (three-vs. five-point rating scales). Conclusion: Overall, this study provides compelling evidence for the high reliability and predictive validity of the PD scale, underscoring its utility in assessing perceived racial discrimination among diverse youth populations in the US.

Indexed as

Factor analysisMeasurement invariancePerceived racial discriminationReliability and predictive validityYouth

Identifiers

PMID41510177
PMCPMC12779107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.